SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Wafer-Level Advanced Packaging Technology

Manish Ranjan, Scott Zafiropoulo and Stephen Kay, Ultratech Inc., San Jose; Thomas Goodman and Peter Elenius, EG Technology Partners, Tempe, Ariz. -- Semiconductor International, 2/1/2004

At a Glance
Recent developments in infrastructure and performance reliability, coupled with technology requirements and shrinking form factors, have contributed extensively to the rapid adoption of packaging innovations at the wafer level.
Sidebars:
Infrastructure Development for PPL

Despite broad declines in the overall semiconductor market segment in recent years, demand for advanced packaging technology continues to rise. Until recently, much attention was focused on gold bump, solder bump and wafer-level chip-scale packaging. The realization that device performance is limited by package performance is promoting the adoption of innovative packaging technologies. Some of these opportunities include fabrication of I/O redistribution structures, on-chip integrated passives and thick copper traces for power management.1 While the growth opportunities for these emerging advanced packaging applications are huge, challenges to equipment sets and process parameters loom large during the emergence phase.

There is a growing disparity between the advances in IC technology and device packaging technology. In recent years, packaging interconnect technology has become one of the bottlenecks in productivity, performance, energy dissipation and signal integrity in leading-edge devices. In addition to flip-chip and wafer-level packaging, device manufacturers and foundry suppliers are focusing on innovative methods to increase the performance and decrease the size of a device. Additional wafer processing in the back-end assembly process has been practiced on a limited scale for years to enhance device functionality. The application and complexity of this "post-passivation layer" wafer processing in the back end will increase as innovative technical solutions are required to enable future high-performance devices.

PPL processing

A post-passivation layer (PPL) is defined as any layer or structure above the final passivation of a chip that adds functionality to the semiconductor device. As seen in Figure 1 , these "above-chip" structures typically are formed on a wafer using thin-film dielectrics, along with sputtered and plated metals. PPL processing can be used to integrate a function that could be performed off-chip, but is desirous to include on-chip for form factor or performance reasons. Formation of structures with PPL processing vis-à-vis wafer fab or back-end-of-line (BEOL) processing is advantageous for several reasons: There is no requirement for the fine features achievable with standard mix-and-match lithography; and a wider range of material properties and thicknesses are possible using advanced packaging processes and equipment.

1. Post-passivation layer (PPL) structure on silicon device where many new packaging technologies extend chip functionality. Note: Drawing not to scale

The use of PPL processing for enhancing device functionality is expected to grow significantly in the next several years. Applications run from established technologies currently in production to those that will be required to enable leading-edge products. The potential application of organic and metal layers to create functional structures on a chip in wafer form is endless. However, in the near term, future product requirements will drive a few key growth areas for PPL — redistribution, above-chip passives, thick copper for power, and stress buffer layers. In each case, similar structures can be formed in wafer fab or BEOL, but the use of PPL processing allows different materials and material thicknesses (albeit at grosser geometries) to be used.

One current and well-known use of PPL structures is the formation of redistribution layers on a chip. The bond pads of a device, typically designed for a wire-bonded interconnect, are routinely rerouted to more favorable locations on the surface of the chip using a passivating organic layer (e.g., polyimide (PI) or benzocyclobutene (BCB)), a layer of patterned metal (e.g., copper), and another layer of organic passivation on top for protection.

Redistribution is often used to move peripheral bond pads on a tight pitch to a more relaxed pitch in an array for flip-chip mounting or wafer-level packaging. In addition, redistribution is finding increasing use in stacked-die packages where rearrangement of I/O is required to wire bond complicated nets. For a large number of die vertically stacked in one package, or for die with unusually large numbers of I/O, bond pads are not always in the place where they are most easily interconnected.

Above-chip passives

The need to integrate passive components in wireless devices is easily understood when one considers the >500 million units of cellular phones that are expected to ship worldwide in 2006,2 and the large contribution that passive components make to a system's cost, size and weight.3 There is an array of integration choices available for reducing the volume and cost of passives in a system, including integrated passive devices (IPDs), embedded passives in substrates, and on-chip passives fabricated in the IC.4

Fabrication of above-chip passives using PPL processing allows designers to take advantage of thick dielectric layers for capacitors and thick copper for inductors. Process technologies and an infrastructure to support PPL passives are still in development. As there are a number of viable passive integration technologies available, the selection of one is complex and involves careful consideration of cost and performance trade-offs.

A related structure is a high-performance PPL transmission line using thick dielectric materials and ground planes. The need for this type of structure is being driven by increasing device speed and data transmission rates. Off-chip solutions have been proposed, but these are unlikely to develop, as they would likely make the device untestable. By implementing the transmission line in a dielectric and wiring layers above the IC, the same result can be achieved, and the device remains testable and, more importantly, under control of the IC fab.

Power copper

Certain devices require thick copper on the surface of the die to carry high current. This is especially true for intelligent power devices that integrate logic and power on a single chip for automotive, inkjet print head and other applications. The required 5-10 µm of copper for these applications is generally not achievable in front-end operations, but rather must be done post-passivation, with plating.

Stress buffer layers

The use of SiO2 dielectrics has presented no fundamental problems in the implementation of advanced packaging. However, the current introduction of low-k and future utilization of ultralow-k interlayer dielectrics (ILDs) has made the management of stress imposed on the device by the package a critical issue.

2. Solder bump stress failures appear more often in packaging processes that employ porous ultralow-k dielectric systems. (Source: Flip Chip Technologies)

Because of their porous nature, low-k ILDs have shown susceptibility to delamination and cracking in packaging processes such as backgrinding, dicing, wire bonding and flip-chip bumping.5 As the mechanical properties of an ILD degrade with increasing porosity, the packaging of ultralow-k ILDs is expected to be even more problematic. Figure 2 shows a typical stress failure of a solder bump on an ultralow-k ILD. Indeed, a chief technologist at a major device maker noted that, although 90 nm devices with low-k ILDs were being packaged satisfactorily, he was "terrified" at the prospect of having to package 65 nm devices with ultralow-k ILDs.

A solution is required to mitigate the stress that packaging will place on these leading-edge dielectrics. The thick, organic PPL structure proposed as a means of protecting ILDs is difficult to implement in standard front-end wafer processing. This type of PPL structure is not currently in production to protect ultralow-k dielectrics, but development of materials and processes is underway.

Summary

Advanced packaging techniques continue to gain mainstream acceptance. Post-passivation lithography techniques are being used to enhance device functionality. While these technologies hold significant promise, it is extremely important to pay considerable attention to the equipment used for various process steps.

As flip-chip and wafer-level packaging techniques achieve industry acceptance, device manufacturers are faced with several manufacturing challenges. To address the technology needs, they are applying traditional front-end lithography equipment to leading-edge back-end packaging applications. This adoption has also been accelerated by the realization that the imaging requirements of wafer bumping are subject to the same production necessities as front-end semiconductor fabrication.


Author Information
Manish Ranjan is strategic marketing manager at Ultratech . He has an M.S. in industrial engineering from State University of New York at Binghamton.
Scott Zafiropoulo is Ultratech's director of strategic marketing and marketing communications. He has a bachelor's degree in social sciences from Colorado State University.
Stephen Kay is director of marketing for advanced packaging technology at Ultratech. He has a B.S. in business and information systems from the University of Phoenix. He is also a founding member of the Advanded Packaging and Interconnect Alliance (APiA).
Thomas Goodman is a founder and managing partner at E&G Technology Partners, a firm specializing in technology commercialization and business development. Goodman has an M.S. in macromolecular science and engineering from Case Western Reserve University, and a B.S. in polymer science from Penn State University.
Peter Elenius is also a founder and managing partner at E&G Technology Partners. He has an M.S. in manufacturing systems, and a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.


References
  1. "Post Passivation Lithography Analysis," commissioned study by E&G Technology Partners, September 2003.
  2. Semico Research Corp., 2003.
  3. J. Dougherty et al., "The NEMI Roadmap: Integrated Passives Technology and Economics," keynote at the 2003 Capacitor and Resistor Technology Symposium (CARTS), Scottsdale, Ariz., April 1, 2003.
  4. N. Pulsford, "Passive Integration Technology: Targeting Small, Accurate RF Parts," RF Design, November 2002, p. 40.
  5. J. Ling et al., "Flip Chip Solder Bumping Compatibility on Cu/Low-k Devices," IMAPS Flip Chip Technologies, Austin, Texas, June 21-23, 2003.
 

Infrastructure Development for PPL

PPL applications span from production solutions with well-defined tools, materials and processes to proposed solutions that, to be brought to fruition, require the development of key technologies. As with many leading-edge, enabling assembly technologies, the development of an available infrastructure is key to widespread adoption.

The state of the PPL infrastructure may be likened to that of the flip-chip bumping industry in the mid-1990s: Technologies existed at a few producers (mainly device manufacturers), but it was not until the development and proliferation of manufacturable technologies at merchant providers and others that the technology began to see widespread use. The adoption of PPL processing is expected to increase as the infrastructure to support it increases. This naturally will be driven by the growing need for technologies to enable the market segments described above.

While the lithography requirements for wafer bumping are subject to the same production and yield demands as front-end semiconductor fabrication, the considerations for back-end lithography are significantly different. Some of the unique requirements for these advanced packaging lithography applications are detailed below.

Thick-resist lithography. The process operating conditions for thick photoresists are considerably different than for thin photoresists. With thick films, the concerns are centered around aspect ratios, downstream plating performance and process latitudes. Ultrathick photoresists also require a large exposure dosage for high-aspect-ratio lithography. For this reason, it is advantageous to use a 1× stepper with a broadband exposure system to maximize the illumination intensity at the wafer plane.

A 1× stepper projects an aerial image that can be focused at various depths within a thick photoresist film. This enables steeper sidewall angles and overall higher image quality, regardless of the photoresist type or thickness being used. This is especially critical for thick photoresists used in straight wall electroplating applications. Contact and proximity aligners have virtually no focus capabilities, and imaging performance is further reduced in thick photoresist applications.1 In addition, 1× steppers for advanced packaging lithography can be optimized for larger geometry while retaining both depth of focus (DOF) and large exposure fields. A low numerical aperture (NA) and broadband illumination spectrum is key for successful advanced packaging lithography.

Wafer edge processing. To ensure a seamless manufacturing process, wafers processed using stepper technology must be compatible with the next process sequence. After the photoresist is patterned, the wafer is processed for metal deposition. Certain metal deposition techniques, such as electroplating, require the outer edge of the wafer to be clear of any resist material. The use of positive resist materials requires the outer edge of the material to be exposed during the lithography step to ensure resist removal during the develop process, while the use of negative resist material requires the outer edge of the wafer to be protected during the lithography process sequence.

Process yields. Yield is one of the primary factors affecting equipment selection for semiconductor manufacturers. By the time a wafer is ready to be bumped, it has gone through numerous process sequences. Yield loss caused by the lithography step directly affects the bottom line, and is unacceptable. A combination of reworkable and non-reworkable yield defects introduced by contact and proximity aligners can lead to significant increase in overall cost. Using non-contact exposure techniques such as steppers to form images eliminates yield losses associated with contact and proximity aligners.2

Process results. As discussed previously, there is a growing demand for post-passivation lithography to enhance the device functionality. One of the key challenges in successful post-passivation lithography is the ability to expose high-aspect-ratio structures without affecting process yields.

References

  1. W.W. Flack, H.A. Nguyen and E.S. Capsuto, "Characterization of an Ultra-Thick Positive Photoresist for Electroplating Applications," Proc. of SPIE Conf. , 2003, Vol. 5039, p. 1257.
  2. M. Ranjan, S. Zafiropoulo and W. Flack, "Productivity Enhancements in Advanced Packaging Lithography," Advanced Packaging, July 2003.
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites